ARTI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1268/2025 · 2025-09-16
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1268 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, he is permitted to correct the memo of bail application by adding Section 109(1) of BNS forthwith.
2. Heard Sri Surya Prakash Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shikhar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and Sri Chandan Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this bail application as the applicant wants to appear before the trial court and seek his release on bail.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 16, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hemant Tripathi, Avneesh Singh, Martand Pratap Singh, Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Arti Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench