Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16291 (JHR)

BIRSINGH HASSA ALIAS BIRSA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4892/2025 · 2025-06-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:16406 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4892 of 2025 ------ Birsingh Hassa @ Birsa, aged about 25 years, son of Late Marki Hansa @ Late Marki Hassa, resident of –Saidba, P.O. – Maranghada, P.S. –Murhu, District –Khunti. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 20.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Saiko P.S. Case No.09 of 2025 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 18(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cultivation of poppy over the forest land. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no FSL report in the record to suggest that the plants which were allegedly cultivated by the petitioner were poppy plants. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the place of occurrence land. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.02.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01.05.2025 in B.A. No. 3426 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge NDPS, Khunti, in connection with Saiko P.S. Case No.09 of 2025 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/