APHC010214752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9419/2019 Between: 1. AMUDALAPALLI VINOD KUMAR,, S/O LATE ODELU, AGE- 29 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE, R/O. Q.NO.1592, BLOCK NO.55, BHOPALAPALLI TOWN, JAYA SHANKAR- BHUPAILAPALLI (OLD WARANGAL) DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, 0/0. SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AT KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NANDHYALA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOILAKUNTLA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. M NARESH, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE NO.1110, KOILAKUNTLA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. DUDEKULA KHASIRN, S/O D. KHASIM, AGE- 28 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. SWAMY NAGAR, KOILAKUNTLA TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOO DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 7. DUDEKULA NOOR BASHA, S/O SUDARSHAN, AGE- 33 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 1-78, BETHAMCHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOO DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by the action of the 4th and 51h respondents, in harassing the petitioner to settle issue in Crime No. 1/2019 of 4th respondent police station at the instigation of the respondents No. 6 and 7, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently, to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to harass the petitioner by insisting him to settle the civil/financial dispute between the petitioner and the respondents No.6, in the police station by calling him to the police station IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to harass the petitioner by insisting him to settle the civil/financial dispute between the petitioner and the respondents No.6, in the police station by calling him to the police station, forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. K K DURGA PRASAD 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9419 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Dr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 11.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9419 of 2019 Date: 11.08.2025 PSA