Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162888 (ALL)

SHYAM PRAKASH VERMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/10281/2025 · 2025-09-08

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10281 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- 3. i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to pay the arrear of Cycle allowance alongwith interest from due date till actual payment made to the petitioners by calculating amount of Rs.200 & 300/- per month allowance w.e.f. 16.11.2012 till 31.12.2019, in pursuant to government orders dated 07.12.2018 & 09.01.2020 issued by the State Government. 4. Since petitioners grievance would require consideration of factual aspect, liberty is granted to petitioners to move fresh individual representations before opposite party no.3 i.e. District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri. In case such representations are filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority in the light of government order in case the same is applicable. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 8, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrawan Kumar Verma, Shruti Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shyam Prakash Verma And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench