AMAR NATH YADAV AND 33 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LABOUR DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/8839/2025 · 2025-09-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8839 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The award in favour of the petitioners was rendered by the Prescribed Authority, Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Assistant Labour Commissioner, Pratapgarh (opposite party no.2) on 25.02.2025 (Annexure no.1) which according to them has attained finality. Pursuant to the award, a recovery certificate has also came to be issued on 27.03.2025 (Annexure no.3). The District Magistrate has failed to execute the recovery certificate and realize the amount due till date.
3. Accordingly, the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh is hereby directed to realize the amount payable to the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and remit the same to the prescribed authority, if there is no legal impediment, so that the same is released in favour of the petitioners, at the earliest.
4. This exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 9, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Nandan Ojha, Akhand Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amarjeet Singh Rakhra (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Amar Nath Yadav And 33 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench