Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162870 (ALL)

VEER VIKRAM BAHADUR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8893/2024 · 2025-09-02

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8893 of 2024 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present on behalf of the applicants. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present. 4. The matter is listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. 5. It is apparent that notices have been issued to the opposite parties, but the steps have not been taken as yet. 6. This application is dismissed accordingly. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Consigned to the records. 9. Office is directed to communicated this order to the learned trial court concerned forthwith. September 2, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Veer Vikram Bahadur Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench