Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16287 (UTT)

SHAHZAD MALIK AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/1943/2025 · 2025-11-07

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 14.11.2025 C-528 No. 1943 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Aamir Malik and Mr. Sachin Veer Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned counsel for the complainants/respondents. 4. A correction application (MCRC No. 2 of 2025) has been filed by the applicant, praying that in the order dated 07.11.2025, in paragraph no. 7, wherein the Criminal Misc. Application along with the Compounding Application was allowed, the word “Khatima” has been inadvertently mentioned in place of “Sitarganj”. The applicant, therefore, seeks correction of the said error. 5. Perusal of the record indicates that learned counsel for the applicant had himself mentioned “Khatima” in the compounding application. 6. Upon this being pointed out, learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is granted permission to carry out the necessary amendment in the compounding application during the course of the hearing. 7. Having considered the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the correction application, and in the interest of justice, the correction application is allowed. 8. Accordingly, in the order dated 07.11.2025, the word “Khatima” shall be read as “Sitarganj”. (Alok Mahra, J.) 14.11.2025 Mamta