ALOK PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN.SECY. LAW AND JUSTICE AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/8732/2025 · 2025-09-25
Prashant Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8732 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 3 and 4 is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri Abhishek Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
3. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned report dated 30.06.2025 submitted against the complaint made by the petitioner on the IGRS Portal bearing reference No. 400/5525048841.
4. Shri Anunay Jha, District Magistrate, Hardoi has joined these proceedings through video conferencing. According to him, the Lekhpal had sent the communication/report which is impugned herein, unnecessarily, therefore, he has been put to show cause and proceedings will be considered against him as per law. He says that there is no hindrance in the use of the land in question by the petitioner who is a recorded tenure holder, as, the land has not been acquired as yet and there is no notification for acquisition as yet.
5. In view of the averments made in Para 6, 13 and 17 of the counter affidavit and the statement of the District Magistrate who has joined through video conferencing, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Alok Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Law And Justice And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
7. It is made clear that if the petitioner is recorded in respect of the land in question and is in possession and there is no legal impediment, no hindrance shall be created by the State Authorities in the use and enjoyment of the said land by the petitioner unless the land is acquired or there is any other ground in law to interfere. September 25, 2025 R.K.P.
WRIC No. 8732 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench