Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162850 (ALL)

UTKARSH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/1174/2025 · 2025-10-08

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1174 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the cognizance order dated 21.08.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 0013/2025, under Section-115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Gosaiganj, District- Ayodhya, (State Versus Utkarsh and others), passed by the court of Juvenile Justice Board, District- Ayodhya, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 18.05.2025, submitted by the Investigating Officer against the applicant, so far it relates with the applicant in aforesaid Case Crime number on basis of compromise with the opposite party no.2 and the applicant only." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitesh Pratap Singh, Shesh Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Utkarsh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 6. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 8, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1174 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench