BADAL MAHTO ALIAS BADAL MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3880/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16285 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16285 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:19902 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3880 of 2025 ------
1. Badal Mahto @ Badal Mahato, S/o Dhananjay Mahato
2. Madhu Mahto @ Madhusudan Mahto, S/o Gurupada Mahato
3. Akash Mahto @ Akash Mahato, S/o Bankim Mahato.
… … Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Victim ‘X’. … … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate
Mr. Arpit Khandelwal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A.P.P. ------
05/ 21.07.2025
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the maximum punishment is less than seven years for the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners have appeared before the Police and are cooperating with the investigation. He thus submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this application to enable them to appear before the concerned Court and take recourse of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Considering the aforesaid submission, permission is granted to withdraw this application.
With the aforesaid liberty, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Prashant. Cp-3