QAYYUM @ AMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/8584/2025 · 2025-09-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8584 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Santosh Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.135 of 2025 under Sections 3, 5(1) of U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 registered at Police Station- Malipur, District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 16.02.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged 25 years for marrying her after converting her religion under allurement of some benefits. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., she stated that her date of birth is 20.10.2000, she has studied up to B.Sc. and D.Pharm., she knows the applicant for the past three years, she had gone with him and married him in a Temple out of her own free will. She stated that she has not converted her religion. 5. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., she reiterated her earlier version. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 25 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 7. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has been submitted on 04.08.2025. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Qayyum @ Aman .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim wherein she has not levelled any allegation against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 25 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 19.07.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9.
9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Qayyum alias Aman be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, unless his/her appearance exempted by the trial Court. September 11, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8584 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench