SHASHI SHUKLA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7791/2025 · 2025-09-15
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7791 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard Ms Sweta Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.65710 of 2025 (State Ram Shukla & others) under section 323,504,506 of IPC in Case crime No.99/2024, PS- Nigoha, District - Lucknow, including the impugned summoning order dated 08.07.2025 passed by A.C.J.M.-I, Lucknow which are not sustainable and liable to be quashed, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surjeet Kumar Mishra, Shweta Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shashi Shukla And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the applicants. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer/Court concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard no application shall be entertained.
With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. September 15, 2025 ML/- A482 No. 7791 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench