HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8818 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to 4 and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 5- Gaon Sabha. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. September 15, 2025 Anuj Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Singh, Shiv Sharan Lal Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Manjive Shukla,J.) Shiv Milan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench