HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10218 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 3, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.4 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsel appearing for respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.4 then respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar, Akansha Pathak, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Ravi Prakash Yadav Hridyesh Nandani Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 4, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 10218 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench