- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10000 WP No. 38212 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.38212 OF 2016 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SMT. CHANNAMMA, W/O R. DEVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O AREHALLI - GUDDADAHALLI, BASHETTIHALLI POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK - 561 203, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, GROUND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 45, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10000 WP No. 38212 of 2016 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 45, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.5.2007 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA SPECIAL GAZETTE NO.703 IN PART III ON 18.5.2007 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES & COMMENCE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560 001 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT AS FAR AS THE SY NO.50/2 OF AREHALLI- GUDDADAHALLI VILLAGE, MEASURING 1 ACRE 29 GUNTAS IS CONCERNED, AT SL NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-O AND ALL ITS RELATED CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Orders were passed on 01.04.2024 that the petitioner shall implead the owner(s) of the land bearing Sy.No.50/2 as additional respondent(s), since the petitioner is challenging the acquisition notification, and the original landlord is someone - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10000 WP No. 38212 of 2016 else. The matter had come up twice thereafter, and there is no compliance. 2. On 03.03.2025, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was finally adjourned for compliance of the order dated 01.04.2024. There is no compliance. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT: BHK