SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No.111 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mayank Datta and Ms. Kavya Mehrishi, learned counsel for the informant. 4. The present anticipatory bail application is arising out of FIR No.0019 of 2025, dated 25.01.2025, under Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of IPC, registered at P.S. Bansant Vihar, District Dehradun. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. It is argued by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant that the present FIR lodged against the applicant is a counter-blast of another FIR lodged by the applicant against the informant Arjun Sharma, and his family members, being FIR No.64 of 2023, registered at P.S. Rajpur Road, Dehradun, in order to usurp the property, the present FIR has been lodged, in which, the applicant has falsely been booked. 7. On the other hand, learned Senior Advocate for the informant opposed the anticipatory bail application by arguing that the applicant has been named in the FIR, and there are serious allegations against the applicant. It is also pointed out that there are five FIRs lodged against the applicant and he has been roped under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. 8. Per contra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicant particularly on this aspect submits that after investigation, in all the FIRs, the final report has been filed and 2 even in the Gangsters Act also, the final report has been submitted, though the matter is pending on the protest petition made by the informant. 8. Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant-Vinod Uniyal is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the I.O. concerned, on the following conditions:- “(i) Applicant shall attend the Trial Court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court. 9. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. 10. Anticipatory Bail Application (No.111 of 2025) stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.02.2025 AK