PAWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF GRAMYA VIKAS LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/10247/2025 · 2025-09-08
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10247 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.4 then the respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Gramya Vikas Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
claim set forth by the petitioner.
September 8, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10247 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench