2025:UHC:11546 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 3 5 6 8 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner through V.C. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner has challenged order dated 26.11.2025, passed by Chief Information Commissioner. By said order, petitioner is asked to supply the required information to respondent No. 4. 3. Learned State Counsel is right in pointing out that no injury is caused to the petitioner as yet, therefore, writ petition is premature. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to respond to the notice by giving appropriate reply. 5. If any injury is caused to the petitioner by penalty order, if passed, then petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.12.2025 Mahinder 2025:UHC:11546