Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162734 (ALL)

SANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/8409/2025 · 2025-09-04

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8409 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 540 of 2009, under Section 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters & Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the aforesaid crime. Further submission is that the applicant is neither a gang leader nor gang member. Learned counsel for applicant has further submitted that two cases have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant, in which he is on bail. He further submitted that the co- accused namely Dileep Singh @ Babloo, whose name has also been shown in the gang chart, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 17.07.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6554 of 2025. Therefore, the present applicant is also entitled to get bail on the ground of parity. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is no illegality in the bail rejection order, hence the applicant is not entitled for bail and the bail application is liable to be rejected. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart and the co-accused has also been enlarged on bail, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for bail. 6. Bail Application is allowed. 7. Let applicant Sandeep Singh be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following additional conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. September 4, 2025 Arun BAIL No. 8409 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench