HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10209 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties the matter is being decided finally. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite he having retired on 31.07.2019 while working on the post of Senior Assistant in the office of Basic Shiksha Adhikari, he has not been paid leave encashment. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that this aspect of the matter has already been considered by this Court in various judgments including in the case of State of U.P. and others vs. Phul Chandra Mishra and another - 2016:AHC:118998-DB decided on 09.08.2016 against which SLP filed by the respondents has also been dismissed. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.4 i.e. Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Hardoi, to consider the claim of the petitioner for payment of leave encashment in accordance with law and relevant rules. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhanshu S. Tripathi, Raghav Bansal, Ritwika Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh, Ran Vijay Singh Sudhir Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Let such consideration be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 7. It is further provided that in case the petitioner is found entitled for any payment the same shall also be released within next four weeks of he being found entitled for the same provided there is no legal impediment. September 4, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 10209 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench