Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162723 (ALL)

RAM ASHISH MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WPIL/927/2025 · 2025-09-04

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 927 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing/commanding the Opposite Parties to ensure the removal of obstacles/encroachment made upon recorded public pathway bearing Gata no.1953 area 0.250 Hectare situated in Village Banghusari, Mouza- Banghusara, Tahsil-Payagpur, District Bahraich which is marked as Chak Marg in the revenue records contained as Annexure no.1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, states that no encroachments exists over the property in question, even the photographs have been filed. 4. In view of the said instructions, which are taken on record, no further direction, as prayed, can be passed. 5. The writ petition is dismissed. September 4, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachichida Nand Shukla, Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Shivam Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Ashish Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench