ANUJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
CRLP/8387/2025 · 2025-09-16
Rajnish Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162722 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162722 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8387 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Shri Atul Kumar and Shri Chandra Shekhar, learned Advocates filed their 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of respondent no.-4, which is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Atul Kumar, learned Counsel for respondent no.4 and learned AGA appearing for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy of anticipatory bail/bail. To which there is no objection by learned AGA.
4. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. September 16, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Devesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Anuj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench