VIVEK @ VIVEK YADAV v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8384/2025 · 2025-09-16
Rajnish Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8384 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy of anticipatory bail/bail. To which there is no objection by learned AGA.
3. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. September 16, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Prashant Dubey (Saurabh Lavania,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Vivek @ Vivek Yadav .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench