Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162716 (ALL)

ADITYA ARUN SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5317/2025 · 2025-09-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5317 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.3 and 4 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Aalapur, Circle Jahangirganj, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Case No.4000 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202404040404000) "Aditya Arun Shukla vs. Ram Shakal" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Aalapur, Circle Jahangirganj, District Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Aalapur, Circle Jahangirganj, District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide the Case No.4000 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202404040404000) "Aditya Arun Shukla vs. Ram Shakal" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Aditya Arun Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5317 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench