RAM BAHADUR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/8555/2025 · 2025-09-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8555 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Karan Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Sinha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 505 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 316(5) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 16.10.2024 against a solitary named accused person Dushyant Shukla, Manager of Yash Bharti Gramin Agro Producer Company Limited stating that the named accused was running a daily deposit scheme for the aforesaid company for the past several years and he suddenly ran away after selling ran away after selling away his car. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case merely because he happened to be Director of the Company and he has no criminal history. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshuman Singh, Vipul Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Bahadur Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
charge sheet has been submitted on 17.04.2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 12.03.2025 and the investigation already stands concluded and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8.
Let the applicant-Ram Bahadur Maurya be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 11, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 8555 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench