Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16271 (RAJ)

AASIF S/O SALIM MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5368/2025 · 2025-05-30

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5368/2025 Aasif S/o Salim Mohammad, Age About 25 Years, Resident Of Ravan Bardi Bakani, Police Station Bakani, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. with Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 30/05/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.60/2025 registered at Police Station Bakani, District Jhalalwar for the offences under Sections 8/22 and 8/29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2025. He further submits that there is no other criminal case pending against the accused-petitioner. He further submits that the contraband recovered from the accused-petitioner is less than the (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5368/2025] commercial quantity and trial of the case will take considerable time, the bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently oppose the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is less than the commercial quantity; the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2025; there is no other criminal case pending against the accused-petitioner; the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioner Aasif S/o Salim Mohammad in connection with FIR No.60/2025 registered at Police Station Bakani, District Jhalalwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance be- fore the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence of similar nature during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every two month in the concerned police station. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5368/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the accused-petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (MANEESH SHARMA),J AARZOO ARORA /237