Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12031 CRL.P No. 1895 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1895 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
PURUSHOTTAM ANAND YADAV S/O BALIRAM YADAV AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO. 1, 6, POCKET BUILDING, YENPURE, NAGAR, DHANKAWADI, PUNE CITY, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA 411043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SURESH KUMAR S, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1.
STATE BY KARNATAKA MARATHAHALLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
SMT. PUSHPA M HONNATTI D/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.- 105, PANCHARATAN APT. OPPO.
NEW AGE SCHOOL, MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA- 560037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M R PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 SRI WASIMPASHA UGRANA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12031 CRL.P No. 1895 of 2025
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.611/2024 REGISTERED BY MARATHAHALLI P.S.
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 29TH A.C.M.M BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 506,420,323,417 OF IPC AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner/accused, who is facing investigation for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 420, 323, and 417 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is before this Court.
2. The second respondent lodged the First Information Report1 stating that the petitioner and the informant were in relationship and the petitioner by promising the marriage induced the complainant to have sexual intercourse and thereafter breached the promise to marry.
3. The petitioner and the complainant are present before this Court and have filed an application for compounding the offences stating that they have amicably resolved the dispute among themselves and in terms of the settlement, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw all the allegations
1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘FIR’```
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12031 CRL.P No. 1895 of 2025
made against the petitioner and has no objection for quashing the impugned FIR.
4. The application is placed on record.
5. Although the offences alleged against the petitioner are cognizable and non-compoundable, given the fact that the second respondent has agreed to withdraw all the allegations and has no objection for quashing the impugned FIR, it would be futile to subject the petitioner for further investigation since the probability of the police filing the charge sheet is unlikely in the light of the settlement. In such circumstances, the continuation of the investigation would be an abuse of the process of law.
6. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is allowed. The impugned First Information Report in Crime No.611/2024 registered by the Marathahalli Police Station is hereby quashed.
Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
ND List No.: 1 Sl No.: 144