2025:JHHC:15948 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3236 of 2025 ----- Sunita Sahay, W/o Kumar Rajeev Ranjan, R/o TI/81, I Type Tenughat, P.O. Right Bank Tenughat, P.S. Gomia, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Dipti Priya Mishra, W/o Sanjiv Tiwari, R/o Paharpur, P.O. Lohchi, P.S. Kharagpur, District- Munger, Bihar, Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Harmu Housing Colony Branch, Ranchi, P.O. and P.S. Argora, District- Ranchi … Opp. Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Md. Shahabuddin, AddI. P.P. …...... 03/ 18.06.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of under Sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences under Sections 316(2), 318, 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(A) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. There is an allegation that by providing forged and fabricated Salary Slips, Employee Identity Card of NIC Dhurwa, Govt. of Jharkhand the petitioner has obtained loan fraudulently. 5. Admittedly, the loan amount has been credited in the account of this petitioner. Further there is allegation that on the basis of fabricated document, the loan was sanctioned. 6. Considering the aforesaid allegation, I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.66 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, XIII, Ranchi, stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./