SHYAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
ABAIL/980/2025 · 2025-09-09
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162706 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162706 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 980 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ganga Prasad Mishra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, Sri S.P. Singh, the learned State Counsel and Sri Ambrish Kumar Pandey, the
learned counsel for the complainant
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.866 of 2019 under Sections 323, 504, 147, 452, 352, 506 IPC registered at Police Station- Kotwali Ayodhya, District- Ayodhya.
3. Learned counsel for the complainant has raised a preliminary objection that the applicant has approached this Court by concealing the relevant fact that earlier he has filed an Application u/S 482 No.8210 of 2022 which was
disposed of by means of an order dated 16.11.2022 after recording that the learned counsel for the petitioners may be permitted to surrender and apply for bail before the Court below and the same may be decided expeditiously.
4. Accepting this submission, this Court had disposed of the Application u/S 482 Cr.P.C. permitting the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within 30 days and file an Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Shyam Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
application for their release on bail. However, there is no mention of this fact in the anticipatory bail application and the applicant has not appeared before the trial Court applied for bail in compliance of the order dated
16.11.2022.
5. Confronted with this situation, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. September 9, 2025 -Amit K- ABAIL No. 980 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench