DINESH CHANDRA @ DINESH KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS v. ADDL. MAGISTRATE FIRST, TEHSIL SADAR, RAEBARELI AND 8 OTHERS
A227/5309/2025 · 2025-09-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5309 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 9.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.2 to 7 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Magistrate First, Tehsil Sadar, District Raebareli to decide the Case No.203 of 2012-13 (Computerized Case No.D2010105800103) "Suresh Chandra vs. Gurudeen Maurya" under Section 229B of U.P.Z.A. &L.R. Act, 1950, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Additional Magistrate First, Tehsil Sadar, District Raebareli, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Additional Magistrate First, Tehsil Sadar, District Raebareli is directed to decide the Case No.203 of 2012-13 (Computerized Case No.D2010105800103) "Suresh Chandra vs. Gurudeen Maurya" under Section 229B of U.P.Z.A. &L.R. Act, 1950, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Umesh Singh Dinesh Chandra @ Dinesh Kumar And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Magistrate First, Tehsil Sadar, Raebareli And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5309 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench