HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8469 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Deepak Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 97 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Kurwar, District- Sultanpur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 02.04.2025 against three named persons and two unknown persons, stating that accused persons came to the informant's brick-kiln and started hurling abuses. When a labour person at the brick-kiln resisted, the accused persons fired a shot at him, which hit him in his leg. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in 12 other cases has been disclosed in para 23 of the affidavit, in six of which he has been released on bail and in one case, he has not received any summon/notice. 5. The Police claimed to have arrested a co-accused Pawan Kumar Maurya and in his custodial statement he stated that he had gone to the brick kiln along with the applicant and another co-accused person- Mitrasen Maurya. Mitrsen Maurya stayed outside the brick kiln with his motorcycle and Pawan Kumar Maurya stated that he had Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Mangal Singh @ Molu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) shot at the victim. 6. Mitrasen Maurya has already granted bail by means of an order dated 27.08.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.8064 of 2025. 7. Learned AGA as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application but they could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Raj Mangal Singh @ Molu be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 8, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8469 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench