SRI. RAVINDRA @ B. N. RAVINDRA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/1846/2025 · 2025-07-08
S R Krishna Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16269 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16269 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24844 CRL.P No. 1846 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1846 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAVINDRA @ B. N. RAVINDRA, S/O B.R. THIMMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/O BELAVADI VILLAGE,
BELAVADI, CHIKKAMAGALURU
TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 148
2. MAHESH E.R., S/O RANGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/O ESHWARAHALLI VILLAGE
ESWARAHALLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 146
3. KUMARA @ KUMARASWAMY K. M.
S/O LATE MUPPENEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/O GOVT SCHOLL
NEAR KEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101
4. ANKITHA K.Y, W/O ANISH C.,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
CHRISTAIN COLONY,
CHIKKAMAGALURU,
TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101
5. JAYANNA, S/O MULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/O NETTEKEREHALLI VILLAGE,
KURUVANGI,
CHIKKAMAGALURU
TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 102
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24844 CRL.P No. 1846 of 2025
6. RAVI @ N. RAVI S/O LATE NANJUDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O CHIKKA DEVANURU DEVANURU,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 175. 7. PUSHPA @ PUSHPA C. S.
W/O RAJENDRA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O BHOONIDHI NILAYA, 1ST CROSS JAYANAGARA EXTN., BEHINDHI SARGODU COFFEE CUTTING WORKS, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101
8. DINESH @ DINESH A. L., S/O LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O PADAMANE VILLAGE, UDDEBORANAHALLI POST, LAKYA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU THALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 168
9. T. S. SHIVANNA @ T.S. SHIVEGOWDA S/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O DASARAHALLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101
10. DHANESHA S/O BHADREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O KAIMARA VILLAGE
HOSAHALLI, POST
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 131. 11. RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR C. S., S/O K. SHRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/O URDU SCHOOL ROAD,
VIJAYAPURA VILLAGE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101. 12. K. R. JAYARAM, S/O LATE K.N. RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
SRI KALASAPURA RANGANATHA NILAYA,
LAST CROSS, SANKARAPURA VILLAGE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUKUU AND DISTRICT – 577 101
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24844 CRL.P No. 1846 of 2025
13. JAGGA @ JAGADISH R., S/O RAJENDRA, WARD NO.9
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
SHANKARAPURA VILLAGE,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUKUU AND DISTRICT – 577 101
14.
RAJIV H. P.
S/O H.S. PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
HAMPAPURA, JYOTHINAGAR
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUKUU AND DISTRICT – 577 101
15. MANJU @ MANJUNATHA T. L., S/O LAKSHMANAGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
TUDUKURU VILLAGE, ALDHURU,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUKUU AND DISTRICT – 577 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BASAVANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST. – 577 101. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001
2. SIR. SHIVAKUMAR B. B.
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, POLICE OFFICER, AGE 51 YEARS BASAVANAHAHALLI POLICE STATION
CHIKKAMAGALURU,
CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1;
R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CR.NO.126/2024 BY THE BASAVANAHALLI POLICE STATION, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST. FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 189(2), 190, 191(2), 285 OF BNS 2023, SAME IS PENDING ON
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24844 CRL.P No. 1846 of 2025
THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, AT CHIKKAMAGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under: Memo for withdrawal
Undersigning counsel appearing for the petitioners respectfully submits that, the above petition was filed challenging the FIR in Crime No.126/2024. This Hon’ble court stayed the further proceedings of the FIR and now the charge sheet is filed. In view of the same, permit the petitioners to withdraw the above petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet. Hence, petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity.”
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 5 Sl No.: 0