Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010214212024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10794/2024 Between:
1. NELATURI SAILAJA, W/O NELATURI MOHAN RAO, AGED 37 YRS R/O DASUGARI STREET, NEAR VIJAYA BANK, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT
3. THE DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, POLAVARAM SUB- DIVISON, POLAVARAM, ELURU DISTRICT
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, JEELUGUMILLI CIRCLE, JEELUGUMILLI, ELURU DISTRICT
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JEELUGUMILLI POLICE STATION, JEELUGUMILLI ELURU DISTRICT
6. VELICHETI KASI VISWANATH, S/O APPARAO, AGE 36YRS, R/O APPALARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE T.NARASAPURAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Order, Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondent police in not taking action on my complaint Dt. 29-02-2024 against Velisetty Kasi viswanath and consequently direct the respondent police to take action on the complaint given by the petitioner on Dt.29-02-2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent to take action on the complaint of the petitioner Dt.29-02-2024 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.10794 OF 2024 ORDER:
1. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner is aggrieved by the in-action on part of respondents in not registering the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.02.2024. 3. After receipt of complaint the concerned respondent tried to contact the petitioner and the petitioner was not contactable and the petitioner did not approached thereafter. Having no option the complaint of the petitioner was closed. 4.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner approached the police, however, they have not taken steps. 5. Considering the same, this Writ Petition is disposed off, leaving it open for the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the 4th respondent in person. Upon receipt of such representation, the concerned respondent shall consider it in accordance with Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM
423 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.10794 OF 2024 Dt.11.07.2025
KGM