Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35869-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3960 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Dwivedi,Vinod Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rahul Chaudhary Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rohit Chaudhary, holding brief of Sri Rahul Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of fourth respondent which is a private finance company. Certain loan apparently was availed for purchase of Mahindra Bolero vehicle. Dispute is raised with regard to action of respondent in repossessing the vehicle. Since the loan has been provided to the petitioner by the private finance company, we find substance in the objection taken by the respondents to the maintainability of the writ, inasmuch as such a petition would clearly not be maintainable as the respondent finance company does not answer the description of State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Leaving if open for the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy before the competent forum, this petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 RA Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad