Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23959 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3334 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Rakhan Opposite Party :- Harshita Mathur, District Magistrate, Raibareli Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Shukla Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel. 2. This application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 18.11.2022 passed on Writ-A No. 7680 of 2022. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the pension has not been revised till date. 4. Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned Standing Counsel, while placing written instructions dated 02.11.2023 duly signed by the respondent-Ms. Harshita Mathur, District Magistrate, Raebareli, submits that the writ Court directed to decide the representation of the applicant, which has already been decided and, therefore, no contempt is made out. The aforesaid written instructions are taken on record. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant, learned Standing Counsel and going through the order of writ Court as well as written instructions placed by the learned Standing Counsel, it is evident that decision on the representation of the applicant has already been taken by the respondent on 02.11.2023. 6. In view of above, the contempt application stands dismissed. 7. However, it is open to the applicant to avail appropriate remedy against the decision taken by the respondent, if he is so aggrieved. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench