Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162616 (ALL)

SUMIT SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1189/2025 · 2025-09-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1189 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Shobhit Kant, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Virendra Kumar, learned AGA for the State. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application as the applicant wants to appear before the trial court and seek his release on bail. 3. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 8, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shobhit Kant, Narendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sumit Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench