HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7536 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Kahkashan Zaidi, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'bleCourt may kindly by pleased to quash the entire proceeding summoning order dated 23-09-2012 passed by Additional Chief Judical Magistrate IV District Lucknow in Charge sheet no. 87/2012 dated-15-07-2012 in Criminal Case no.-4501267/2012, Case Crime no. 44/2012, U/s 363/366 I.P.C, Police Station-Bazar Khala District Lucknow, styled as State... Vs. Saurabh, Pending Before Additional Chief Judical Magistrate IV District Lucknow.., as Contained in ANNEXURE no. 1 and 2 to this application, during the pendency of this application." 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that under some misunderstanding, the present F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant and thereafter, the parties have amicably settled their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 29.08.2025, which has been annexed as annexure no. 6 to this application. He submits that now there is no grievance in between the parties and the criminal proceedings against the applicant are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicant and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arshad Jameel, Mohammad Naseem, Mohd. Salman Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sourabh @ Kumar Sourabh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicant may be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicant and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably while executing a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicant, therefore, the criminal proceedings instituted against the applicant may be dropped. 6. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. 7. Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 8. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 9. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 10. For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the Criminal Case No.4501267 of 2012 "State..... Vs...... Saurabh", arising out of Case Crime no. 44 of 2012, U/s 363, 366 I.P.C, Police Station Bazar Khala District Lucknow, shall remain stayed so far as applicant is concerned. 11. The trial Court is directed to examine the fact that whether all the parties against whom the chargesheet was filed, the party in the compromise and in this respect, it shall also sent a report along with the verification order. 12. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. September 9, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7536 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench