Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162601 (ALL)

SMT. SAHROONA @ NOORJAHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.

BAIL/8645/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8645 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.293 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85, 352, 351(3) BNS and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Padhua, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argue that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant was married to son of the applicant around three years ago and despite being paid dowry she was harassed and subsequently killed. The cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem hanging. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts that the applicant is mother in law and there is no allegations against her, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 8.6.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Smt. Sahroona @ Noorjahan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajiva Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Sahroona @ Noorjahan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8645 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench