BASHARAT RAZAK v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECY HOME AND ORS
CRM(M)/28/2025 · 2025-07-11
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1626 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1626 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No.28/2025
Basharat Razak
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None. q
vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 11.07.2025
Petitioner is continuously absent today on 3rd consecutive date of hearing which is sufficient to indicate that he has lost interest to prosecute this petition. Hence, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 11.07.2025 Eva
Sr. No. 41