Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162595 (ALL)

PAWAN KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIA/10244/2025 · 2025-09-04

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10244 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned state counsel for opposite parties 1 to 4 and Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties 5 to 9. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider petitioners' claim for appointment on the post of Gram Chowkidar in the village concerned and for payment of prescribed salary. Learned counsel for opposite parties 5 to 9, on the basis of instructions, submits that the Gaon Sabha of the villages concerned has already resolved in favour of petitioners for appointment on the said post but actual orders are required to be passed by the District Magistrate concerned. In view of such a statement being made by learned counsel for opposite parties 5 to 9, the opposite party No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Ayodhaya, District Ayodhya, U.P. is directed to take a final decision with regard to the issuance of appointment letters to the petitioners expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. The petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Manish Mathur,J.) Pawan Kumar And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench