HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5267 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2 and Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent no. 2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Lucknow Region, Lucknow to decide on merit the Revision/ Case No. 824/1998- 1999 Computerized Case No. C199910000239 Lucknow (Babu Ram Vs. Smt. Madhurani and other) filed under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, along with restoration application/ case No. 10/2024 Computerized Case No. C202410000000010, as early possible. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Lucknow Region, Lucknow is desired to make all endeavor to decide on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vashu Deo Mishra, S.K. Mishra Nagraha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Madhurani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) merit the Revision/ Case No. 824/1998-1999 Computerized Case No. C199910000239 Lucknow (Babu Ram Vs. Smt. Madhurani and other) filed under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, along with restoration application/ case No. 10/2024 Computerized Case No. C202410000000010, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5267 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench