Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162573 (ALL)

Manoj Kumar v. Smt. Juli

CMRAD/143/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 143 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. I.A. No. 1 of 2025 (Application U/s 5 of the Limitation Act) 1. The application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the review application. 2. Cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 3. Delay in filing the review application is condoned. Order on merit 4. Heard the counsel for the applicant. 5. The review application has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 15.07.2025. 6. The ground taken by the counsel for the applicant is that in the application under section 24, it has been stated that the applicant Smt. Juli is working as a government employee, is an incorrect statement. It is further argued that the brother of the present applicant is suffering from Kidney disease and it would be inconvenient for him to attend the proceedings at Unnao. It is further admitted that the proceedings under section 125 are going on at Unnao. 7. All these aspects were reasonably considered in the judgement dated 15.07.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akansha Rajput, Vivek Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Manoj Kumar .....Applicant(s) Smt. Juli .....Opposite Party(s) 8. No good ground for review is made out. 9. The application is dismissed. September 9, 2025 VNP/- CMRAD No. 143 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench