Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162566 (ALL)

RAM SUNDAR v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (URBAN) U.P. JAL NIGAM, 6, RANA PRATAP MARG, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10196/2025 · 2025-09-04

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10196 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard Dr. Ved Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Krishna Vishwakarma holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for release of post retiral benefits along with interest thereof in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated from service on 30.04.2024 and no dues certificate has also been issued to him. 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent No. 2 i.e. The Finance Director, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid reliefs, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr.Ved Prakash, Mukul Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor (Abdul Moin,J.) Ram Sundar .....Petitioner(s) The Managing Director (Urban) U.P. Jal Nigam, 6, Rana Pratap Marg, Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench