Smt. A.Marthamma v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal
WP/816/2014 · 2025-07-09
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16256 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16256 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010213602014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 816/2014 Between:
1. SMT. A.MARTHAMMA, W/O A.PRABHUDAS, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.GARGEYAPURAM VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, HOUSING CORPORATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, URDU GALLI, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, SANKSHEMA BHAVAN, BIRLA GATE, KURNOOL-518 002. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURNOOL MANDAL, KOTHAPET, KURNOOL CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No.3 and 4 in threatening to dispossess the petitioner herein from the land admeasuring Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No. 749 situated at Gargeyapuram village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of Law, as being illegal and arbitrary and
2
consequently direct the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 893 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 herein not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy.No. 749 situated at Gargeyapuram village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WVMP 3053 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim direction granted on 13.01.2014 in WP No. 816/2014 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD)
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC)
4.
GP FOR HOUSING
The Court made the following ORDER:
Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated 10.07.2025 SPP
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 816 OF 2014
Dated 10.07.2025 SPP