HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8618 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Srivastava, the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Atul Kumar Dwivedi who appears for the respondent no. 3 & 4. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that despite the petitioner making all the compliances, respondent no.3 and 4 did not take the decision within the timeline as is prescribed and contained in Annexure no.1. 3. It is informed that the timeline has been fixed in terms of the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court vide order dated 09.05.2025 passed in M.A. No.711 of 2025 in Civil Appeal No.9048 of 2012 (Parshvanath Charitable Trust and others vs. All India Council for Technical Education and others). 4. As, the timeline has been fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, no directions can be issued by this court. The petitioner, if so desires, may move appropriate application before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 5. The writ petition stands disposed off in terms of the said order. September 4, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Srivastava, Mohd. Aatif Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Lalit Shukla (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Impact College Of Science And Technology Thru. President Sri Sultan Ahmad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Technical Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench