ARVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/924/2025 · 2025-09-04
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 924 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Standing Counsel and Sri Banwari Lal Maurya who appears for the respondent no.5.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer :
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the concerned opposite parties to remove / demolish the encroachment and illegal construction on Gata No. 8519, area 0.028 hect., situated in Village - Bahadurpur, Jayas, Tehsil -Tiloi, District Amethi, which is mentioned as Chak Marg in the revenue records."
3. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, states that the proceedings under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code have already been initiated.
4. In view of the said statement, it is directed that the pending proceedings shall be concluded with all expedition preferably within a period of ninety days in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition stands disposed off with the said observations. September 4, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Banwari Lal Maurya, Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench