Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162515 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD UMAR v. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

A227/5292/2025 · 2025-09-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5292 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent no. 1 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the pending Case No. T202404040200665 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 "Mohd. Umar Versus Shridhar Dubey" pending since 4.2.2024, expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar is desired to make all endeavor to decide the pending Case No. T202404040200665 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 "Mohd. Umar Versus Shridhar Dubey", expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohammad Umar .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5292 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench