JAMEEL AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8484/2025 · 2025-09-19
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8484 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard Shri Ajey Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the FIR has been lodged.
3. To which there is no objection by the other side.
4. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 19, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Jameel Ahmad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench