SMTI LAIPINA SANGMA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS
WA/76/2025 · 2025-12-15
Soumen Sen, W Diengdoh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1625 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1625 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WA No. 76 of 2025 Date of order: 15.12.2025
1. Smti Laipina Sangma
2. Smti. Grenitha Marak @ Ginitha ….Appellants - versus -
1. The State of Meghalaya represented by its Commissioner & Secretary, Home Department, Shillong, Meghalaya.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Resubelpara, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. The Officer-in-Charge, Kharkutta Police Station, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
4. The Officer-in-Charge, Women Police Station, Kharkutta, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
5. Shri. Greaterson Marak
6. Shri. Jithalson Sangma
7. Shri. Kington Momin
8. Shri. Plindro Momin
9. Shri. Goldeng Momin
10. Shri. Banseng Sangma
11. Shri. Lipston Marak
12. Shri. Dalsing Sangma
13. Shri. Gilbirth Arengh
14. Shri. Dronath Sangma
15. Shri. Chaila Sangma ….Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Soumen Sen, Chief Justice
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Serial No. 1 Supplementary List 2025:MLHC:1219-DB
Appearance: For the Appellants : Mr A.G. Momin, Adv. with
Ms L.D. Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondents : Mrs N.G. Shylla, Sr GA with
Mr A.M. Pala, GA
Mr K. Ch. Gautam, Adv. with
Ms A. Rani, Adv. [for R5-15]
i) Whether approved for
Yes/No
reporting in Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)
Pursuant to the notice, the private respondents are represented by
learned counsel, Mr K. Ch. Gautam. The learned counsel for the said respondents on instructions has submitted that the respondents will not stand in the way if the disputes are amicably settled.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellants also submitted that the appellants are also ready to amicably settle the disputes.
3. The report filed by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) and the Superintendent of Police, North Garo Hills, Resubelpara are taken on record.
4. Since the said authorities are in seisin of the matter and an appropriate direction has been passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) with regard to maintaining peace and tranquillity, we dispose of this writ appeal by directing the parties to abide by the decision of the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial). The police 2025:MLHC:1219-DB
administration must ensure that no breach of peace takes place in the area. The parties are directed to approach the Secretary, Mediation Committee for referring their dispute to mediation within two weeks from date. The Secretary, DLSA is directed to appoint a mediator in consultation with the Chairperson of the Mediation Committee from the list of empanelled mediators to resolve the dispute between the parties amicably. All notices regarding the mediation proceeding shall be served upon the Advocate- on-Record for the parties which shall be deemed to be of service upon the parties themselves.
5. The appeal stands disposed of.
(W. Diengdoh) (Soumen Sen)
Judge Chief Justice
2025:MLHC:1219-DB Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2025.12.15 18:14:24 IST