Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162486 (ALL)

ABHIMANYU SINGH @ KAILASH SINGH AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, DEVI PATAN MANDAL, GONDA AND 7 OTHERS

A227/5311/2025 · 2025-09-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5311 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 8. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.3 to 5 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda to decide the Revision No.C202408000001685, under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, "Ugrasen Singh and others vs. Abhimanyu Singh and others", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Revision No.C202408000001685, under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, "Ugrasen Singh and others vs. Abhimanyu Singh and others", along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Abhimanyu Singh @ Kailash Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5311 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench